American presidents spend their time in office trying to carve out a
prominent place in the nation's collective memory, but most are destined
to be forgotten within 50-to-100 years of their serving as president,
suggests a study on presidential name recall released today by the
journal Science. "By the year 2060, Americans will probably
remember as much about the 39th and 40th presidents, Jimmy Carter and
Ronald Reagan, as they now remember about our 13th president, Millard
Fillmore," predicts study co-author Henry L. Roediger III, PhD, a human
memory expert at Washington University in St. Louis.
Roediger, the James S. McDonnell Distinguished University Professor
in Arts & Sciences, has been testing the ability of undergraduate
college students to remember the names of presidents since 1973, when he
first administered the test to undergraduates while a psychology
graduate student at Yale University.
His current study, co-authored with Washington University graduate
student K. Andrew DeSoto, compares results from the presidential-recall
tests Roediger has given to three generations of undergraduate college
students (1974, 1991 and 2009) and a similar test offered online to 577
adults ages 18-69 in 2014.
While Roediger's early research used the presidential-recall test to
study patterns of remembering and forgetting in individual test takers,
the new study was able to uncover how Americans forget presidents from
our historical or popular memory over time.
In each test, participants were provided a numbered list with blank
spaces and asked to fill in the names of all presidents they could
remember in the order in which they served. If they could remember names
but not the order, they were instructed to guess or to put the names
off to the side. Thus, the results could be scored for recall of
presidents with or without regard to correct order.
Findings showed several consistent patterns in how we have forgotten
past presidents and offer a formula to predict the rate at which current
presidents are likely to be forgotten by future generations.
Among the six presidents who were serving or had served most recently
when the test was first given in 1973, Harry S. Truman, Lyndon B.
Johnson and Gerald R. Ford are now fading fast from historical memory,
whereas John F. Kennedy has been better retained. The study estimates
that Truman will be forgotten by three-fourths of college students by
2040, 87 years after his leaving office, bringing him down to the level
of presidents such as Zachary Taylor and William McKinley.
The current data do not permit assessment of forgetting rates of the
most recent presidents, and do not specify why some relatively recent
presidents are forgotten more rapidly than others, Roediger said.
"Kennedy was president less than three years, but is today remembered
much better than Lyndon Johnson," Roediger said. "One idea is that his
assassination made him memorable, but of course that does not apply to
James Garfield or William McKinley, who were also assassinated and are
remembered relatively poorly.
"Kennedy may be well recalled because his brothers and other family
members were (and are) active in politics and help to keep his memory
alive," Roediger speculated.
HIllary Clinton, if elected in 2016, has the potential to be much
better remembered than her husband, because her presidency would
represent a unique first in American history. Barack Obama may be well
remembered for the same reason, Roediger said.
The rate at which college students forgot the order of recent
presidents remained remarkably consistent over time and across different
groups of college students. In 1974, nearly all college students
recalled Johnson and his ordinal position (36), but by 1991, the
proportion remembering him dropped to 53 percent and by 2009, it
plummeted to 20 percent.
When asked to name the presidents in the order they served, we as a
nation do fairly well at naming the last few presidents, but our recall
abilities then fall off quickly, with less than 20 percent able to
remember more than the last eight or nine presidents in order, the study
finds.
While Americans who were tested could name the nation's first
president (George Washington) and do reasonably well at naming the next
three or four presidents in order, the recall success rate for early
presidents also drops off sharply, with fewer than 25 percent of
Americans able to recall more than the first five presidents in order.
"Out of the 150 college students we tested in 2009, only four of them
were able to recall virtually every president and place each in the
correct position," DeSoto said. "It's possible that these individuals
used a mnemonic like a song or rhyme that they learned for the purpose
of remembering the presidents."
With a few interesting exceptions, the vast majority of presidents in
the middle of pack -- from No. 8, Martin Van Buren, to No. 30, Calvin
Coolidge -- already are largely forgotten by the average American, the
study finds.
The probability that anyone who took the test could recall both the
name and the order of most presidents in this middle range is quite low,
and this level of poor recall for the middle presidents has generally
held true in testing across all generations for nearly four decades.
A notable exception in this middle wasteland of presidential recall
is Abraham Lincoln and his two immediate successors, Andrew Johnson and
Ulysses S. Grant.
"Clearly, Lincoln and his successors are well remembered because of
their association with the American Civil War and the ending of slavery,
but it is notable that many students and adults also often know that
Lincoln was the 16th president," Roediger said.
Other pre-Coolidge presidents who were remembered reasonably well in
the free recall portion of the test are Theodore Roosevelt (26), William
Howard Taft (27) and Woodrow Wilson (28), a showing that could be
related to their favorable rankings by historians and ongoing mentions
in popular culture and news media, the researchers suggest.
Roediger's prediction about the memorability of Reagan and other
recent presidents hinges on two core principles of human memory that are
confirmed by this study and related research.
First, when presented with information in a long list, we tend to
best remember items that are presented at the beginning and end of the
list. Second, items presented in the middle of a long list are better
remembered when they are somehow distinctive and different from other
items in the list.
America's memory for Johnson and Reagan, like that for most
presidents, is destined to fade along a quick and predictable trajectory
as new elections inexorably push them and their memories further down
the list of the most recent and currently best-remembered presidents,
the study suggests.
While most collective memory research conducted thus far has explored
how we as a nation remember historic events, such as the Holocaust or
the 9/11 terror attacks, this study is among the first to focus on how
we forget salient events of the past over generations and to obtain
estimates of rate of forgetting over time.
"Our results show that memories of famous historical people and
events can be studied objectively," Roediger said. "The great stability
in how these presidents are remembered across generations suggests that
we as a nation share a seemingly permanent form of collective memory."
No comments:
Post a Comment